New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Get the iPhone MyHealth app »
Get the Android MyHealth app »
Abstract
Thirty-two cemented revision hip arthroplasties done with a straight-stem Muller prosthesis were reviewed an average of 3 years after operation (range, 2-4.4 years). Acetabular revision, performed in 29 cases, we done with a support ring, mesh, or bone graft in 18 of 29 (62%) cases. Acetabular and femoral cement pressurization techniques were not used. Trochanteric osteotomy was done in 15 cases (47%). The average patient age was 60.2 years (range, 20-85 years). Based on the clinical rating system of Swanson and Evarts, there were 21 (65.6%) excellent, 2 (6.3%) good, 8 (25%) fair, and 1 (3.1%) poor results. The clinical outcome was better after revision from a resurfacing arthroplasty (87.5% good/excellent results) than from uni/bipolar or total hip arthroplasty (60%). Radiographic examination suggests that two femoral components and one acetabular component are loose. These patients have a fair clinical rating. None have been revised. Trochanteric wire breakage (60%) and displacement (26.7%) was common if trochanteric osteotomy was done.
View details for PubMedID 3612143