Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

See our updated masking policy »

Stanford Health Care

Impact of Post-PCI FFR Stratified by Coronary Artery. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions Collet, C., Johnson, N. P., Mizukami, T., Fearon, W. F., Berry, C., Sonck, J., Collison, D., Koo, B. K., Meneveau, N., Agarwal, S. K., Uretsky, B., Hakeem, A., Doh, J. H., Da Costa, B. R., Oldroyd, K. G., Leipsic, J. A., Morbiducci, U., Taylor, C., Ko, B., Tonino, P. A., Perera, D., Shinke, T., Chiastra, C., Sposito, A. C., Leone, A. M., Muller, O., Fournier, S., Matsuo, H., Adjedj, J., Amabile, N., Piróth, Z., Alfonso, F., Rivero, F., Ahn, J. M., Toth, G. G., Ihdayhid, A., West, N. E., Amano, T., Wyffels, E., Munhoz, D., Belmonte, M., Ohashi, H., Sakai, K., Gallinoro, E., Barbato, E., Engstrøm, T., Escaned, J., Ali, Z. A., Kern, M. J., Pijls, N. H., Jüni, P., De Bruyne, B. 2023; 16 (19): 2396-2408

Abstract

Low fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Hitherto, this assessment has been independent of the epicardial vessel interrogated.This study sought to assess the predictive capacity of post-PCI FFR for target vessel failure (TVF) stratified by coronary artery.We performed a systematic review and individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies with protocol-recommended post-PCI FFR assessment. The difference in post-PCI FFR between left anterior descending (LAD) and non-LAD arteries was assessed using a random-effect models meta-analysis of mean differences. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization.Overall, 3,336 vessels (n = 2,760 patients) with post-PCI FFR measurements were included in 9 studies. The weighted mean post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and differed significantly between coronary vessels (LAD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.88 vs non-LAD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94; P < 0.001). Post-PCI FFR was an independent predictor of TVF, with its risk increasing by 52% for every reduction of 0.10 FFR units, and this was mainly driven by TVR. The predictive capacity for TVF was poor for LAD arteries (AUC: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58) and moderate for non-LAD arteries (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; LAD vs non-LAD arteries, P = 0.005).The LAD is associated with a lower post-PCI FFR than non-LAD arteries, emphasizing the importance of interpreting post-PCI FFR on a vessel-specific basis. Although a higher post-PCI FFR was associated with improved prognosis, its predictive capacity for events differs between the LAD and non-LAD arteries, being poor in the LAD and moderate in the non-LAD vessels.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.018

View details for PubMedID 37821185